Spoilers & News > News > Fate/stay night Heaven's Feel Film Project Gets Trilogy

Fate/stay night Heaven's Feel Film Project Gets Trilogy

03.28.2016 14:23

Fate/Stay Night Manga

http://www.mangahere.co/manga/fate_stay_night/

 

At AnimeJapan 2016, the staff of the Fate/stay series announced that Fate/stay night: Heaven's Feel film will be split into three separate films. The first part will premier in 2017. The project was previously announced in 2014 as a single film.


 

Tomonori Sudou will direct the films and ufotable will animate the work. The previous announcement revealed that Takahiro Miura was providing the storyboards.

 

The official website released a teaser video.

 

 

"Heaven's Feel" is based on the original visual novel. The manga adaptation began in May.

 

The TV anime adaptation of Fate/stay night's 'Unlimited Blade Works' premiered last October. The Fate/stay night anime premiered in 2005.

 

 

FACEBOOK COMMENTS MANGA HERE COMMENTS (11) Newest Oldest Popular

kotomine2016-04-11 09:38

To be fair, Heaven's feel is far too complicated to fit into a single movie without butchering it. Splitting it into three parts is much smarter in the long run and is good news for us (if the director doesn't screw this up). Either way, it's the route that I've been waiting for more than a decade so DON'T YOU DARE SCREW THIS UP!!

Reply

Visitor2016-04-10 02:19

My worst route .I don't feel happy about this tbh

Reply

Visitor2016-04-09 11:59

Visitor2016-03-30 20:51

About what I expected. There's no way they could have done it all in one go without messing it up; it would be too long. This is a good sign.

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 21:47

I think we should be concerned over this news actually. I mean, the movie was first written and produced under the assumption that it was going to be just one movie, right? So wouldn't it affect the story and flow of the movie by a lot if the people working on the project were suddenly told to split it into 3 parts? We have seen a lot of stories in different mediums (like games and movies) that suffered because they had to either split their story apart, forcefully and unnaturally lengthen their show or movie, or maybe even cut down on their ideas to compromise with a companies's business decisions (like cutting down budget for the sake of saving more money, even though they would have gained more money by letting the project have more capital). The argument that it really should be cut down because it might have been too long can be a logical cause of concern, but that argument doesn't hold much water once we consider the fact that there have been movies that run for about 3-4 hours long (ex. The Lord of The Rings) and yet were able to become critical and commercial successes. TL;DR / The question now is, was this decision made for the sake of artistic integrity or was it for the sake of saving or exploiting a couple bucks? Is the story going to benefit from the multiple lead ins/ act 1s/ pseudo act 1s and etc or is the movie going to suffer because of it? Ahh, skepticism skepticism

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 22:07

Just tried to look up who the director is, and whether or not we can definitely feel safe about the current situation of the movie. My results, more skepticism :( According to myanimelist, this is going to be his first job at being a movie director. He has taken up a few roles as animation director, but he has only directed an episode of an anime once, and never again, as of right now (Look at his Anime Staff Positions on his page). Of course, maybe we just don't have enough information about him circulating on the Internet, and maybe I'm just not looking enough or at the right places yet, and maybe this info is even wrong, but as it stands, with nothing telling me to feel otherwise, I'm not so sure about this movie. Somebody please give me good info so I'll be fine :'(

Reply

WoT'ing much? Anyways, Heaven's Feel's story is, quite frankly, too long to fit into a single movie. A fair number of fans figured they'd either have to separate it into several installments, or severely compress it like Deen did with UBW, with said fans keeping their fingers crossed that they'd do the former, which they did. Of course it's too soon to be sure, but this is probably a good sign.

Reply

Visitor2016-04-07 19:37

Visitor2016-03-30 20:51

About what I expected. There's no way they could have done it all in one go without messing it up; it would be too long. This is a good sign.

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 21:47

I think we should be concerned over this news actually. I mean, the movie was first written and produced under the assumption that it was going to be just one movie, right? So wouldn't it affect the story and flow of the movie by a lot if the people working on the project were suddenly told to split it into 3 parts? We have seen a lot of stories in different mediums (like games and movies) that suffered because they had to either split their story apart, forcefully and unnaturally lengthen their show or movie, or maybe even cut down on their ideas to compromise with a companies's business decisions (like cutting down budget for the sake of saving more money, even though they would have gained more money by letting the project have more capital). The argument that it really should be cut down because it might have been too long can be a logical cause of concern, but that argument doesn't hold much water once we consider the fact that there have been movies that run for about 3-4 hours long (ex. The Lord of The Rings) and yet were able to become critical and commercial successes. TL;DR / The question now is, was this decision made for the sake of artistic integrity or was it for the sake of saving or exploiting a couple bucks? Is the story going to benefit from the multiple lead ins/ act 1s/ pseudo act 1s and etc or is the movie going to suffer because of it? Ahh, skepticism skepticism

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 22:07

Just tried to look up who the director is, and whether or not we can definitely feel safe about the current situation of the movie. My results, more skepticism :( According to myanimelist, this is going to be his first job at being a movie director. He has taken up a few roles as animation director, but he has only directed an episode of an anime once, and never again, as of right now (Look at his Anime Staff Positions on his page). Of course, maybe we just don't have enough information about him circulating on the Internet, and maybe I'm just not looking enough or at the right places yet, and maybe this info is even wrong, but as it stands, with nothing telling me to feel otherwise, I'm not so sure about this movie. Somebody please give me good info so I'll be fine :'(

Reply

you sure? because when i also looked up on myanimelist, he's also a director of some kara no kyoukai movies and just so you know, kara no kyoukai has 7 movies and also by ufotable. well, rest assured as long as the movie is by ufotable and directed by the same person as the one who direct kara no kyoukai i guess

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 22:07

Visitor2016-03-30 20:51

About what I expected. There's no way they could have done it all in one go without messing it up; it would be too long. This is a good sign.

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 21:47

I think we should be concerned over this news actually. I mean, the movie was first written and produced under the assumption that it was going to be just one movie, right? So wouldn't it affect the story and flow of the movie by a lot if the people working on the project were suddenly told to split it into 3 parts? We have seen a lot of stories in different mediums (like games and movies) that suffered because they had to either split their story apart, forcefully and unnaturally lengthen their show or movie, or maybe even cut down on their ideas to compromise with a companies's business decisions (like cutting down budget for the sake of saving more money, even though they would have gained more money by letting the project have more capital). The argument that it really should be cut down because it might have been too long can be a logical cause of concern, but that argument doesn't hold much water once we consider the fact that there have been movies that run for about 3-4 hours long (ex. The Lord of The Rings) and yet were able to become critical and commercial successes. TL;DR / The question now is, was this decision made for the sake of artistic integrity or was it for the sake of saving or exploiting a couple bucks? Is the story going to benefit from the multiple lead ins/ act 1s/ pseudo act 1s and etc or is the movie going to suffer because of it? Ahh, skepticism skepticism

Reply

Just tried to look up who the director is, and whether or not we can definitely feel safe about the current situation of the movie. My results, more skepticism :( According to myanimelist, this is going to be his first job at being a movie director. He has taken up a few roles as animation director, but he has only directed an episode of an anime once, and never again, as of right now (Look at his Anime Staff Positions on his page). Of course, maybe we just don't have enough information about him circulating on the Internet, and maybe I'm just not looking enough or at the right places yet, and maybe this info is even wrong, but as it stands, with nothing telling me to feel otherwise, I'm not so sure about this movie. Somebody please give me good info so I'll be fine :'(

Reply

Visitor2016-04-02 21:47

Visitor2016-03-30 20:51

About what I expected. There's no way they could have done it all in one go without messing it up; it would be too long. This is a good sign.

Reply

I think we should be concerned over this news actually. I mean, the movie was first written and produced under the assumption that it was going to be just one movie, right? So wouldn't it affect the story and flow of the movie by a lot if the people working on the project were suddenly told to split it into 3 parts? We have seen a lot of stories in different mediums (like games and movies) that suffered because they had to either split their story apart, forcefully and unnaturally lengthen their show or movie, or maybe even cut down on their ideas to compromise with a companies's business decisions (like cutting down budget for the sake of saving more money, even though they would have gained more money by letting the project have more capital). The argument that it really should be cut down because it might have been too long can be a logical cause of concern, but that argument doesn't hold much water once we consider the fact that there have been movies that run for about 3-4 hours long (ex. The Lord of The Rings) and yet were able to become critical and commercial successes. TL;DR / The question now is, was this decision made for the sake of artistic integrity or was it for the sake of saving or exploiting a couple bucks? Is the story going to benefit from the multiple lead ins/ act 1s/ pseudo act 1s and etc or is the movie going to suffer because of it? Ahh, skepticism skepticism

Reply

fate-desu2016-03-31 05:22

i need earthmind's heaven's feel in this movie

Reply

Visitor2016-03-30 20:51

About what I expected. There's no way they could have done it all in one go without messing it up; it would be too long. This is a good sign.

Reply

Visitor2016-03-28 17:56

pls ufotable do it right

Reply

Visitor2016-03-28 15:31

New girl woo, Hollow Ataraxia please or new Carnival Phantasm yes.

Reply

Jump to Page

Hot Tags

Rencent News